IRS to drop suit following Swiss assurance to disclosure names of suspected tax evaders

The Internal Revenue Services has said that it will drop a lawsuit against UBS, the world’s largest private bank, following confirmation from Switzerland that it is on track to produce details for the remaining 2,450 of 4,450 American clients suspected of using UBS accounts for tax evasion. The IRS has received 2,000 thus far.

Although this provides some respite for UBS and the Swiss banking system, the impending disclosures themselves could bring more litigation against those professionals that may have facilitated tax evasion.

William M. Sharp, a tax lawyer who represents a number of former UBS clients, told the New York Times that some Americans among the 4,450 names had hidden accounts of more than $100 million. While it has not happened yet, the IRS has indicated that if all 4,450 names are received by this fall, it may withdraw the John Doe summons, a separate request for 52,000 UBS client names.

Two reports indicate possible redirection of IRS efforts to prevent fraud in the tax-exempt sector

A report released today by the Treasury Department’s Inspector General for Tax Administration outlines some of the difficulties that the IRS has had in prosecuting criminal tax fraud in the tax-exempt sector and provides statistics supporting an overall decline in such cases in the last 3 years.

The findings of the report also suggest that investigations into tax-exempt organizations have been less successful than other investigations, yielding only 35% convictions or guilty pleas (the average for all investigations is 53%). Victor Song, chief of the Criminal Investigation Division, took issue with that statistic and responded saying that 81.8% is the conviction rate for tax-exempt cases if measured only by those that see trial.

Another report released separately today urges the IRS to act more aggressively with section 527 tax-exempt political organizations that file late or incomplete forms. The report estimates that $5.3 million could be collected by pursuing those applicable penalties.

Small businesses join forces in opposition to tax evasion

A new grass-roots campaign against tax avoidance will be announced Tuesday; it will boast the support of hundreds of representatives and investors in small businesses and will be formed of a coalition of non-profit groups that believe tax avoidance is bad for U.S. business.

“The campaign is unusual because it is the first time that small businesses have organized to combat offshore tax avoidance and evasion in a significant way,” reports Lynnley Browning of The New York Times. The campaign is backed by Democratic senator Carl Levin, who has investigated offshore tax havens and their wealthy patrons.

The report to be released argues that American multinational corporations avoid at least $37 billion in federal taxes annually, and calls for new laws to prevent offshore finagling of taxable earnings as well as the repeal of certain rules that currently facilitate such tax evasion.

France aims to use leaked data to prosecute tax evaders

Details surrounding the acquisition and transfer of client information from HSBC’s Swiss private-banking arm have placed a Franco-Italian computer engineer and colleague at the center of a dispute between Switzerland and France. While Switzerland objects to the use of data that it claims was stolen, France intends to use the data to prosecute potential tax cheats and has even shared the information with other countries.

Although some evidence indicates that the computer engineer and colleague were attempting to sell the client banking information, France insists that it did not pay for the data and rather attained it lawfully. The data was in fact acquired by French authorities acting at the request of a Swiss prosecutor to conduct a search.

Regardless of the details of the data’s acquisition, the release of client information and the ensuing international dispute over legitimacy has, as The Wall Street Journal writes, “rocked the banking world.” Tax evaders in Italy, Spain, and the U.K. may soon face prosecution as a result of this data leak.

I.R.S. achieves victory over tax havens

Recent advances in the I.R.S.’s efforts to prevent tax-evasion among Americans illegally concealing taxable assets in offshore holdings may signal an end to the acceptability of these practices in popular tax havens.

“The Swiss Parliament’s approval of a deal to give the I.R.S. the names on 4,450 American accounts at the Swiss bank UBS is an important victory,” states a New York Times editorial today. Additionally, bilateral tax treaties entered into by the United States, Switzerland, Singapore, Luxembourg and other countries require that certain tax information be disclosed to treaty partners, overriding individual bank secrecy laws.

Further, Congress’s March passage of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act will require, beginning in 2013, foreign financial entities to disclose information about American account holders and business owners on penalty of a substantial withholding tax on income from U.S. securities.

Swiss Parliament sides with I.R.S. in deal to expose potential tax evaders

The Swiss Parliament agreed today to uphold an August 2009 arrangement with the United States, whereby UBS, Switzerland’s largest bank, would disclose information on 4,500 accounts held by Americans suspected of tax evasion.

Lynnley Browning of The New York Times reports that “The parliamentary approval was a watershed moment in the history of Swiss private banking, whose tradition of client confidentiality goes back centuries.”

The decision, which represents months of legal and diplomatic efforts, will likely be used as a template to pursue tax fraud and tax evasion perpetrated in conjunction with other banks in Switzerland, such as Credit Suisse and HSBC, as well as operations in such burgeoning tax havens as Hong Kong and Singapore.

I.R.S. statements cast pall over BAB market

Concerns have risen following a series of statements from the I.R.S. suggesting that federal interest-rate subsidies could be lost or diminished on more than $100 billion worth of Build America Bonds, or BABs, that certain states and cities have already sold.

Although BABs have been extremely popular in the municipal bond market since their introduction in April 2009, concerns over I.R.S. audits and subsequent reductions of federal subsidies are expected to cause considerable concern over the continued issuance of such bonds.

Issuers of BABs will likely consider the risk to their credit that the uncertainty of federal subsidies carries. The I.R.S., which at one point claimed would audit up to half of all issued bonds, is currently in a research phase, preparing to determine the extent of future audits.